<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strategy for day two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/</link>
	<description>Strategy &#38; Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scion</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Scion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-224</guid>
		<description>The unfortunate thing about cheaters,,,,,is well that they have already shown no compulsion not to cheat....which means that there is nothing stopping them from turning there attention to you.

Unfortunately if you come under the attention of a multi-account cheater trying to &#039;get&#039; their multi&#039;s is a waste of time....so you hazard them....so what the cheater can just create a bunch more, and transfer the funds around using any level 3 account.

If you do want to get even then your only real hope is to try and identify their main account....or the account that has the motst invested in it.....and then hit it in a lightening raid. Im not convinced that hazards are all that effective although although at the very least i suppose they do take up real-estate.  What i think is probably more effective is to go after the expensive buildings....trying to destroy stored wealth.....but then again this is a loosing batle as well since a multi can generate wealth k.N times faster than you anyway (N being the number of &#039;main&#039; accounts and k a multiplier dependant on how much farming of minor accounts theyre doing)

The only strategy that i can see is to hope that the multi that is targeting you is not local or interested in a particular street and start a new account and trasfer all your assets to the new one, and let the old one die (this could be considered cheating under the strictest interpretation of the rules- 1 account per player, but i would argue what is intended is one active account per player, in which case you are ok...this is another reason why a delete account option should be available)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The unfortunate thing about cheaters,,,,,is well that they have already shown no compulsion not to cheat&#8230;.which means that there is nothing stopping them from turning there attention to you.</p>
<p>Unfortunately if you come under the attention of a multi-account cheater trying to &#8216;get&#8217; their multi&#8217;s is a waste of time&#8230;.so you hazard them&#8230;.so what the cheater can just create a bunch more, and transfer the funds around using any level 3 account.</p>
<p>If you do want to get even then your only real hope is to try and identify their main account&#8230;.or the account that has the motst invested in it&#8230;..and then hit it in a lightening raid. Im not convinced that hazards are all that effective although although at the very least i suppose they do take up real-estate.  What i think is probably more effective is to go after the expensive buildings&#8230;.trying to destroy stored wealth&#8230;..but then again this is a loosing batle as well since a multi can generate wealth k.N times faster than you anyway (N being the number of &#8216;main&#8217; accounts and k a multiplier dependant on how much farming of minor accounts theyre doing)</p>
<p>The only strategy that i can see is to hope that the multi that is targeting you is not local or interested in a particular street and start a new account and trasfer all your assets to the new one, and let the old one die (this could be considered cheating under the strictest interpretation of the rules- 1 account per player, but i would argue what is intended is one active account per player, in which case you are ok&#8230;this is another reason why a delete account option should be available)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omfg</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Omfg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Ur right, there&#039;s more of us the them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ur right, there&#8217;s more of us the them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonopolyHQ</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>MonopolyHQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-213</guid>
		<description>I wish the game moderators would just take care of every cheater... but till then... let&#039;s all get those cheaters - now we&#039;ve got targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the game moderators would just take care of every cheater&#8230; but till then&#8230; let&#8217;s all get those cheaters &#8211; now we&#8217;ve got targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omfg</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Omfg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Omfg this one person has like 10 accounts and keeps sabotoging me!!! Let&#039;s team up on him !!!


MTM080404
MTM08040404
MTM0804040
MTM0804040404 (main)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omfg this one person has like 10 accounts and keeps sabotoging me!!! Let&#8217;s team up on him !!!</p>
<p>MTM080404<br />
MTM08040404<br />
MTM0804040<br />
MTM0804040404 (main)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wew_at_twitter</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>wew_at_twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Nha...the best way to find street finding is to trace highways....

One portion of United State HWY 2 worth $42million ~and US HW 6 worth 27/14/11/9/.etc. millions for different portions...

well..too bad they are brought....

The 42 mil street is by MONOPOLIS one of the cheaters....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nha&#8230;the best way to find street finding is to trace highways&#8230;.</p>
<p>One portion of United State HWY 2 worth $42million ~and US HW 6 worth 27/14/11/9/.etc. millions for different portions&#8230;</p>
<p>well..too bad they are brought&#8230;.</p>
<p>The 42 mil street is by MONOPOLIS one of the cheaters&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonopolyHQ</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>MonopolyHQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve yet to find a better way... look at the zoomed out map for areas where there appear to be lots of long streets.  zoom back in and check the buy list.  People don&#039;t seem to be sharing their finds much, understandably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve yet to find a better way&#8230; look at the zoomed out map for areas where there appear to be lots of long streets.  zoom back in and check the buy list.  People don&#8217;t seem to be sharing their finds much, understandably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonopolyHQ</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>MonopolyHQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Yeah, let me know when you find those $10 million dollar streets!  i&#039;m sure they&#039;re still out there, but they&#039;re rare.  I should&#039;ve jotted them down when I was stumbling across them with only $3million the first day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, let me know when you find those $10 million dollar streets!  i&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re still out there, but they&#8217;re rare.  I should&#8217;ve jotted them down when I was stumbling across them with only $3million the first day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonopolyHQ</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>MonopolyHQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-70</guid>
		<description>feel free to post constant annoying threats here.  and yes, the leaderboard is horrible.  if hasbro doesn&#039;t do something i&#039;m hoping someone develops a better extended ranking system outside of the game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>feel free to post constant annoying threats here.  and yes, the leaderboard is horrible.  if hasbro doesn&#8217;t do something i&#8217;m hoping someone develops a better extended ranking system outside of the game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Vacation</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>On Vacation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s hard to find the longer, expensive streets.  They don&#039;t show up on my &quot;buy&quot; list unless I have the map at a certain place on the street, somewhere around the middle.  They&#039;ve broken up a lot of streets and highways into more than one section, so it&#039;s difficult to find where the street begins and ends in order to locate the middle.  I just have to scroll and scroll until I hit it lucky.  Is there a better way?  How on earth do you find a $30 M street?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s hard to find the longer, expensive streets.  They don&#8217;t show up on my &#8220;buy&#8221; list unless I have the map at a certain place on the street, somewhere around the middle.  They&#8217;ve broken up a lot of streets and highways into more than one section, so it&#8217;s difficult to find where the street begins and ends in order to locate the middle.  I just have to scroll and scroll until I hit it lucky.  Is there a better way?  How on earth do you find a $30 M street?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wew_at_twitter</title>
		<link>http://monopolyhq.com/2009/09/strategy-for-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>wew_at_twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monopolyhq.com/?p=66#comment-63</guid>
		<description>real strategy is to find streets that worth over $10,000,000...
By the 4th day, I will be able to afford the $30,000,000 (30X profit) street!
Using differential equations via vector calculus helps a lot...

and of coz....the help of javascripts makes life easier..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>real strategy is to find streets that worth over $10,000,000&#8230;<br />
By the 4th day, I will be able to afford the $30,000,000 (30X profit) street!<br />
Using differential equations via vector calculus helps a lot&#8230;</p>
<p>and of coz&#8230;.the help of javascripts makes life easier..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

